Back to Open Bids
samgovArizona43 days left

RNLASF APACHE M-TADS/M-PNVS SPARES� LOCKHEED MARTIN SOLE SOURCE

Issuing Agency:DEPT OF DEFENSE / DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (AL)

Solicitation ID:sam_4f7a746b1acf4c1daeb3b617cb17abc2

Standard Labor WagesSBE/DVBE Preference
Estimated ValueValue TBD
Response Deadline9/1/2026
Original Sourcesamgov

RFP Description

This requirement is for a critical component supporting the International Apache Product Office (IAPO) for the Royal Netherlands Land Air & Space Force (RNLASF) for Procurement of APACHE M-TADS/M-PNVS Spares. This is a sole-source action issued to Lockheed Martin Corporation (CAGE 04939) pursuant to the authority of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) FAR 6.103-1(b); ��only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.� The Government contemplates a Firm-Fixed-Pricing (FFP) single purchase resulting in a delivery order to be issued against Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA) SPE4A125G0025 in accordance with the terms and conditions under BOA SPE4A123G0017. The procurement is for the following M-TADS/PNVS items. DESCRIPTION NSN Part QTY M-PNVS TURRET 1240-01-518-3638 79760505-009 3 BORESIGHT MODULE 1240-01-589-5433 79760230-019 2 COLOR TADS ELECTR DISPLAY & CTL 1240-01-676-4038 79722960-009 10 M-LASER RANGE FINDER/DESIGN) 1240-01-687-6187 79787541-002 5 M-NSA STRUCTURE 1240-01-687-6785 79763030-009 3 M-NIGHT SENSOR SHROUD 1270-01-535-8920 79760015-019 2 M-NSA TARGETING RECEIVER 1270-01-547-7770 79745095-001 2 M-PTUR RECEIVER 1270-01-547-7773 79718560-001 2 MPAZD (ADG) 1680-01-516-6818 79760545-009 2 Cost and Pricing Proposal Content/Cost/Price Supporting Documentation. At a minimum, offeror proposal shall include the following: The offeror shall prepare one summary schedule. Along with the summary schedule, the offeror shall provide fully supportable cost data which substantiates the offeror�s summary schedule for the P/Ns. Submission must include working excel formulas, if applicable. Submission shall be in accordance with FAR 15.408-2, Table 15-1, Instructions for Submitting Cost/Price Proposals When Certified Cost or Pricing Data Are Required. Back up documentation shall detail the labor categories to be used, labor hours proposed by category, material and equipment cost, and a total cost breakdown. The offeror shall also provide supporting cost/price documentation for all proposed subcontractors, to include the proposed type of subcontract. Accordingly, proposal submittal shall include mandated price analysis of all subcontractor proposals and a cost analysis of each subcontractor proposal for which certified cost or pricing data is required. Fair and reasonable subcontractor analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-8 Subcontract Pricing Considerations shall accompany proposal submission. An un-sanitized cost breakdown (all cost information, rates/dollars) shall also be provided in a Microsoft Excel File. The proposed Indirect Expense Rates, Inter-Organizational Transfers (IOTs) and its subcontractor(s) shall provide documentation of the most recent Indirect Expense Rates, to include at least one of the following: Forward Pricing Rate Agreements (FPRAs) with DCAA or DCMA; or Forward Pricing Rate Recommendations (FPRR) from DCAA or DCMA; or Forward Pricing Rate Proposal (FPRP), Approved Provisional Rates Proposal or other statement of current rates including three (3) years of Incurred Cost Submissions to DCAA detailing pools and bases (by expense accounts) information which validates the calculations or Three (3) years historical actual detailing pools and bases (by expense accounts) information which validates the calculations. Note: The rates reflected in the FPRA, FPRR, FPRP, Approved Provisional Rates Proposal or other statement of current rates shall directly match the proposed rates as detailed in the proposal. If the rates do not match, the offeror shall provide sufficient detail explaining how the proposed rates are realistic. Identify key business unit personnel related to contracting, technical and pricing questions and known DCMA or DCAA business unit points of contact (POCs) to expedite the question/review process. Offeror shall identify and address in its proposal all actual or potential Organizational Conflicts of Interests (OCIs), per FAR 9.5, or state that there are no known potential OCIs. If any actual or potential OCIs are identified, then offeror shall submit a mitigation plan. No assumptions, terms, conditions, caveats or exceptions submitted within offeror proposal, in response to this RFP, will be accepted or incorporated into the basic contract. All assumptions shall be addressed and/or resolved prior to award. Offeror shall submit their subcontracting plan with their proposal as a separate document. The subcontract shall be incorporated by reference and made a part of the final award. The subcontract will be used to ensure offeror is on track to meet the goals established in the base contract. Additional Considerations Containers - The Government did not provide separate Subcontract Line Item Numbers (SLINs) to accommodate items that may require reusable shipping containers. However, if an item requires a reusable shipping container, a SLIN may be added to allow the offeror to price the item with a shipping container. The offeror shall propose the most expeditious delivery schedule for each item. First Article Test (FAT) - may be required, and when applicable, the requirement will be documented at the CLIN level and priced separately. When required, the FAT report shall be submitted in English. The offeror may submit a Request for FAT Waiver; however, FAT shall be included on the award in anticipation of the requirement on future orders. FAT is not restricted to a specific ordering period and may be implemented with any order during the duration of the contract at the discretion of the engineering source authority. Offeror may submit a request for waiver, although a waiver is not guaranteed. Evaluation Criteria - Minimum technical requirements. To be technically acceptable and thus, eligible for award, a proposal must conform to all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements provided within all sections of this solicitation and/or within its attached addenda. Proposals receiving a technical rating of �Unacceptable� will be ineligible for award. Price. In addition to meeting the solicitation�s technical and quantity increment or range requirements above and cost and pricing requirements below, the Government will evaluate a proposal�s pricing for reasonableness. Evaluation of a proposal's pricing will not obligate the Government to order the estimated quantities or to distribute orders in the manner evaluated. The Government may reject a proposal as �Unacceptable�, if its pricing is determined to be materially unbalanced. Cost and Pricing Data. Offerors must provide all cost or pricing information required by FAR 15.4. Failure of a proposal to provide cost or pricing information required by FAR 15.4 will result in said proposal being deemed Unacceptable, and thus, ineligible for award. Product Quality Deficiency Report (PDQR) - The Product Quality Deficiency Report Program (Army Regulation 702-7) will be used when contractors: 1) deliver deficient items or 2) receive deficient items from a DoD supply chain in support of Army requirements. When requested, the Contractor shall assist the cognizant Contract Administration Office in evaluating PQDRs and exhibits for defects reported on items manufactured under this contract to determine the root cause for deficiencies. Corrective action and Preventative Action to preclude recurrence of discrepancies shall be an integral part of the Contractor�s Quality Program. These defects may be reported from any DoD activity that discovers a defective item. ProPricer System � If utilizing Propricer, the offeror shall provide the original unedited ProPricer system generated Excel file is hereby requested. In Excel Workbook format (.xlsx) provide a ProPricer system generated �Detail Cost Breakdown� report, with �Export Full Pricing� set to �Annual�. This Excel file shall be a full working cost model containing the original columns, formulas, and worksheets only. Do not modify

How to Win This Contract

This solicitation is set aside for certified Small Businesses (SB/SBE) or Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises (DVBE) in Arizona. Prime contractors bidding must meet specific set-aside quotas or sub out scopes to certified firms to remain responsive. For projects of this size, having clear, compliant documentation and showing immediately available resources to execute the work is the fastest path to selection by DEPT OF DEFENSE / DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (AL). Ensure all bid packages, attachments, and compliance affidavits are completed and uploaded to samgov before the closing deadline on 9/1/2026.

Unlock AI Analysis & Match Scoring

See your custom win probability, compliance checklist, and automated proposal plan.

View Analysis
RFP Response Writing & Bid Management

Want to submit a winning proposal for this contract?

Stronger Built's proposal consulting team acts as your in-house bid desk. We parse the statement of work, draft compliant responses, compile set-aside certs, and manage submission. With our Pay-When-You-Win model, you mostly pay us only when your business wins.